Why should I consult instructions from outside my circuit?
Not all circuits have pattern instructions. If your circuit does not have pattern instructions, it is obviously beneficial to look at how each circuit views your theory of the case, and to pick the language that best presents your client's view.
Even circuits with pattern instructions may miss statutes or subjects covered in other circuits.
If your circuit's instructions are several years old, they may not address the latest legal developments (e.g., new legislation or a new Supreme Court decision).
A topic treated in a cursory manner in your circuit might be the subject of an extended, well-reasoned annotation in another circuit, and suggest a claim or defense that had not occurred to you.
You won't know until you have looked at every circuit. That's why they are
all collected here in a common index.
Trialdex indexes all federal civil and criminal instructions and annotations that have official or quasi-official status (i.e., are posted on a federal court Web site). This includes unofficial instructions from the First and Fourth Circuits. These instructions may also be browsed or
full text searched.
Trialdex does not index secondary source instructions available on pay sites. This would include O'Malley (sometimes called "Devitt/Blackmar") instructions (available on Westlaw), Modern Federal ("Sands") (Lexis), and DC Red/Blue book instructions (Lexis). These instructions are helpful if you have the proper subscriptions, but they are not as authoritative as official instructions.
Other sources for federal jury instructions are listed in the Third Circuit's
Model Civil Jury Instructions at
Trialdex does not index state instructions, but links to any state instructions that are posted on the Internet can be
found here, along with a box that allows you to full text search them.
Due to Google limits on query size, which in turn limits the number of sites that can be searched simultaneously, the search box uses "radio buttons" to break up the search into three discrete searches: federal (all the federal circuits);
state (AL-LA)(Alabama-Louisiana); and
state (MA-WA) (Massachusetts-Washington).
Some courts do not post instructions on the Internet, so those instructions will not be picked up by the search engine. Also, although the query attempts to screen out documents that are not jury instructions, some documents that are not instructions may show up in the results.
Keeping current with new or amended instructions is a challenge, since the courts post the changes with little if any notice. So I check the federal sites every week, and the state sites almost as often, and update our indexes and links accordingly.
When I do these updates, I detail the changes on the trialdex
jury instruction blog, and email jury instruction alerts to anyone who has
signed up for them. This is a free service, and that list is not used for any other purpose.
Note that subscription sites like Westlaw and Lexis are much more casual about updates; they can take months (sometimes over a year) to post new or modified instructions.
No matter which service you use, it is good practice to double check the official sites (conveniently linked here) before citing a pattern instruction.
Can I sign up to be notified when instructions are revised?
Yes. Send an email request to firstname.lastname@example.org to receive free jury instruction email alerts whenever a circuit or state adds or revises a pattern jury instruction. The email will link expert commentary in the trialdex
jury instruction blog with, where helpful, a redline/strikeout view of the changes.
Your email address will be stored offline, and will not be used for any other purpose. All emails will come with an "opt out" link.
Every United States Supreme Court decision cited in a federal instruction or annotation appears in the trialdex index.
Every reference to a United States Code (U.S.C.) statute, C.F.R. provision, or federal rule in a federal instruction or annotation is linked linked as well. Just click on the usc, cfr, or
rules links at the end of the
The trialdex index links to the formats that are on the official sites (PDF, DOCX, WPD), but the principal link will typically be to a PDF copy. There is a way to craft PDF links so that they take you to the specific page where the instruction appears, and most trialdex PDF links are constructed to work that way.
This works fine if you are using Chrome, Firefox, or Opera, but other browsers, notably (at this writing) Edge and Safari, will ignore the page number and send you to page one of the PDF (explanation). Also, the page numbers in some circuit tables of contents are unreliable; in those cases the link may take you to the beginning of a section of instructions, or a table of contents.
This should not be a critical issue. If the link does not send you to the precise page, just scroll down, or use your browser's Ctrl-F ("find in page") command to navigate to the specific instruction.
Trialdex litigation tools may be used to spot issues and identify important authority (rules, statutes, Supreme Court cases). They are intended to replicate the organized thinking process of a legal expert. They are accompanied by flowcharts, but the Q&A format permits explanations of the legal terms that would not fit in the chart.
For example, the flowchart for the lawful interrogation tool
can be viewed by clicking on the image on the right, but there is no room on the chart for definitions of the legal terms (e.g., "custody" or "interrogation") or case citations. That information is available in the Q&As.
No, they are not, and they do not create an attorney-client relationship with the reader. The suggested answers are the beginning of your legal research, not the end. This should be self-evident, since trialdex tools are functionally similar to any secondary legal resource (just a bit smarter). A trialdex tool will give you a suggested issue or result, and a case or other authority to use in continuing with conventional research.
It should be noted that the answers are based on federal law, and do not directly address state constitutions or statutes. But federal authority is often persuasive in state litigation (state rules tend to be modeled on federal rules).
No. The lawful interrogation and
automobile search tools, for example, can be used by defense attorneys, prosecutors, and judges to spot issues and leading cases before proceeding with conventional legal research.
But they may also be used by police officers. In most cases, officers will know from training and experience whether to proceed with questioning or a search, but these tools can be used to confirm those judgments, and to assist in framing questions for police
legal advisors. The charts posted here are also freely available as training aids.